Skip to main content
Checklist

Hub-and-Spoke Checklist: 12 Items Every Ecommerce Store Should Audit

By ยท Updated ยท 7 min read

Why Hub-and-Spoke Audits Matter for Ecommerce Stores

A hub-and-spoke content architecture organizes your ecommerce site around a central pillar page (the hub) that links to and from a cluster of related spoke pages. When the structure breaks down โ€” missing links, orphaned spokes, duplicate hubs โ€” search engines lose the topical authority signal the architecture is designed to create. Revenue impact follows.

This audit covers 12 discrete checks. Each one has a binary pass/fail condition so you can assign remediation tasks immediately. Run it quarterly, or after any major site restructure, category expansion, or platform migration.

Hub Page Checks (Items 1โ€“4)

CHECK 1 โ€” Hub page exists for every core product category. Pass: one designated hub page exists per top-level category (e.g., /collections/running-shoes or /guides/running-shoes), and that page is indexed. Fail: the category relies solely on a filtered collection page with no editorial content, or the page returns a 4xx/5xx status.

CHECK 2 โ€” Hub page links out to every active spoke in its cluster. Pass: every spoke page in the cluster receives at least one in-body (not footer, not navigation) internal link from the hub page. Fail: any spoke in the cluster has zero internal links from the hub. Use a crawl tool to verify โ€” navigation links do not count toward this check.

CHECK 3 โ€” Hub page has a unique, keyword-rich H1 that reflects cluster intent. Pass: the H1 on the hub page targets the broadest commercial or informational keyword for the cluster and does not duplicate the H1 of any spoke. Fail: the hub H1 is generic (e.g., 'Category Page'), missing, or identical to a spoke H1.

CHECK 4 โ€” Hub page word count exceeds all spoke pages in its cluster. Pass: the hub page contains more editorial content (excluding boilerplate) than any individual spoke in the cluster. Fail: a spoke page outranks or out-sizes the hub on content length. This is a signal the hub needs expansion, not that the spoke needs trimming.

Spoke Page Checks (Items 5โ€“8)

CHECK 5 โ€” Every spoke page links back to its hub. Pass: each spoke contains at least one in-body link pointing to the hub page using descriptive anchor text (not 'click here' or 'back to category'). Fail: the spoke has no link to the hub, or the only link is a breadcrumb. Breadcrumbs are supplemental; they do not substitute for editorial backlinks.

CHECK 6 โ€” No spoke page is orphaned (zero internal links from any page). Pass: every spoke page receives at least two internal links โ€” one from its hub and one from another spoke or a site-level entry point. Fail: a spoke page has one or zero internal links site-wide. Orphaned spokes waste crawl budget and receive no link equity.

CHECK 7 โ€” Spoke pages do not cannibalize the hub's target keyword. Pass: each spoke targets a distinct long-tail or sub-topic keyword that does not match the hub's primary keyword. Fail: two or more pages in the cluster target the same keyword in their title tag and H1. Run a keyword cannibalization check across title tags to identify conflicts.

CHECK 8 โ€” Spoke pages cover the full topic perimeter of the hub. Pass: every major subtopic surfaced by keyword research for the hub's theme has at least one corresponding spoke page. Fail: significant subtopics exist (evident from search demand) with no corresponding spoke. This gap signals missed topical coverage that competitors fill.

Internal Linking Structure Checks (Items 9โ€“10)

CHECK 9 โ€” Anchor text is descriptive and varied across cluster internal links. Pass: at least 80% of internal links within the cluster use descriptive anchor text that includes the target page's keyword. No single anchor text phrase is used for more than 40% of links pointing to a given page. Fail: anchor text defaults to URLs, 'read more', 'learn more', or product SKUs.

CHECK 10 โ€” Spoke-to-spoke cross-links exist where topically adjacent. Pass: spokes that share a closely related subtopic link to each other (not just back to the hub). A running-shoe size guide spoke links to the running-shoe fit guide spoke, for example. Fail: all spoke links flow exclusively up to the hub and back down, with zero lateral links. Lateral links distribute authority and extend session depth.

Technical and Crawlability Checks (Items 11โ€“12)

CHECK 11 โ€” Hub and all spoke pages are crawlable, indexable, and canonicalized correctly. Pass: no hub or spoke page is blocked by robots.txt, carries a noindex tag, or has a canonical pointing away from itself (unless intentional for faceted navigation). Fail: any page in the cluster is self-defeating โ€” built to rank but technically excluded from the index.

CHECK 12 โ€” Hub page is within three clicks of the homepage. Pass: the shortest crawl path from the homepage to the hub page is three clicks or fewer. Fail: the hub is buried four or more clicks deep. Deep hub pages receive diluted link equity from the homepage and are crawled less frequently. Flatten the site architecture or add homepage-level navigation entries to fix this.

Acting on Your Audit Results

Score each check as Pass (1 point) or Fail (0 points). A score of 10โ€“12 indicates a structurally sound hub-and-spoke architecture. A score of 7โ€“9 flags moderate structural risk โ€” prioritize Checks 1, 5, 6, and 11 first, as these have the highest crawl and indexability impact. A score below 7 indicates the architecture is not functioning as a coherent cluster.

Assign each failed item a ticket with a clear owner: content team for Checks 3, 4, 7, 8; SEO/development for Checks 1, 11, 12; editorial/linking for Checks 2, 5, 6, 9, 10. Re-run the full audit after remediation to confirm pass status before moving to the next cluster. For stores with more than 10 product categories, stagger audits by cluster so remediation stays actionable rather than overwhelming.

Frequently asked questions

How often should an ecommerce store audit its hub-and-spoke architecture?

Run a full 12-item audit quarterly for stores with active content production or category expansion. Run it immediately after a platform migration, major URL restructure, or any change that touches internal linking at scale. Waiting longer than six months creates compounding issues โ€” orphaned spokes accumulate and cannibalization problems deepen before they surface in rank tracking.

What is the most common hub-and-spoke failure found in ecommerce stores?

The most common failure is orphaned spoke pages โ€” spokes that receive zero or one internal link site-wide. This happens when product guides, buying guides, or comparison pages are published without updating the hub page to link out to them. The spoke exists in the CMS but is invisible to search engines because no crawlable path leads to it.

Do breadcrumb links count as hub-to-spoke or spoke-to-hub links in this audit?

No. Breadcrumb links are structural navigation elements and are treated as supplemental by search engines. For this audit, 'in-body link' means a link placed within the editorial content of a page, not in a breadcrumb, header, footer, or site-wide navigation element. Each check requiring a hub-to-spoke or spoke-to-hub link requires at least one in-body instance.

Can a single page serve as both a hub and a spoke?

Yes. A page can be a spoke within a broader cluster (e.g., a 'running shoes' hub) while simultaneously acting as a hub for a narrower cluster (e.g., 'trail running shoes' spokes). This nested structure is normal in large ecommerce taxonomies. When auditing, classify each page by its primary role within the cluster being reviewed.

How many spokes should a hub page have?

There is no fixed number. The correct number of spoke pages equals the number of distinct subtopics within the hub's theme that have genuine search demand. A hub with three high-volume subtopics needs three spokes minimum. A hub covering a broad category may require 15 or more. Gaps in spoke coverage are identified through keyword research, not by targeting a specific count.

MG
Written by

Matt is the founder of RunOctopus. He built All Angles Creatures from zero to page-1 rankings in reptile feeder insects in under 60 days using exactly this method โ€” turning a hard, entrenched niche into RunOctopus's proof store for programmatic SEO and AI search citation.

Connect on LinkedIn →

See what Otto would build for your store

Free architecture preview. No card required. Five minutes.

Generate Preview →